Model Profile
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Use this page to decide where this model is a strong fit. Rankings below are benchmark-backed by use case, with explicit confidence and contributor metrics.
Identity
ID: microsoft/Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Author: microsoft
Origin: huggingface_catalog
Arch: unknown
Benchmark Coverage
Scored use cases: 12
Avg confidence: 14.8%
Evidence points: 55
Raw rows: 18
Weighted rows: 7
Catalog Metadata
Parameters: unknown
Context window: 4096
Downloads: 342,554
Intelligence Profile
Dimension Breakdown
No iq benchmarks found
No eq benchmarks found
No accuracy benchmarks found
No creativity benchmarks found
* Low confidence — limited benchmark evidence for this dimension
1/5 dimensions scored · Last updated Apr 2, 2026
Benchmark Signals
Click through to the benchmark source behind this model profile.
LanguageBench
overall:mean
Normalized value 36.8% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Archaic and historical translation
languagebench.overall_mean · Apr 1, 2026
LanguageBench Grammar/Clarity Official (Split)
grammar_clarity_score_pct
Normalized value 46.7% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Translation and localization
languagebench_grammar_clarity_official.grammar_clarity_score_pct · Apr 1, 2026
LanguageBench
mmlu:accuracy
Normalized value 45.3% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Lesson plan generator
languagebench.mmlu_accuracy · Apr 1, 2026
LanguageBench Translation Official (Split)
translation_to:chrf
Normalized value 4.5% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Legal translation
languagebench_translation_official.translation_to_chrf · Apr 1, 2026
LanguageBench Translation Official (Split)
translation_to:bleu
Normalized value 0.5% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Archaic and historical translation
languagebench_translation_official.translation_to_bleu · Apr 1, 2026
LanguageBench
translation_to:bleu
Normalized value 0.5% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Archaic and historical translation
languagebench.translation_to_bleu · Apr 1, 2026
Some fit rows have limited benchmark evidence.
11 of 12 scored use cases have low confidence or thin contributor coverage.
Coverage Diagnostics
actively scoredUse-Case Scores
14
Total Measurements
18
Weighted Measurements
7
Weighted Sources
3
Raw Source Coverage
Weighted Source Coverage
Best Use Cases for This Model
| Use Case | Score |
|---|---|
| Grammar and writing coach use_case.lang.grammar_coach | 3.6% |
| Archaic and historical translation use_case.history.archaic_translation | 3.6% |
| Multilingual Customer Support use_case.cx.multilingual_support | 3.5% |
| Language conversation partner use_case.lang.conversation_partner | 3.3% |
| Lesson plan generator use_case.edu.lesson_plan_generator | 3.2% |
| Socratic tutor use_case.edu.socratic_tutor | 3.2% |
| Translation and localization use_case.business.translation_localization | 3.2% |
| Grading and feedback assistant use_case.edu.grading_feedback_assist | 3.0% |
| Brand voice localization use_case.mkt.brand_voice_localization | 2.8% |
| Legal translation use_case.legal.legal_translation | 2.6% |
| Cross-lingual summary use_case.business.cross_lingual_summary | 2.5% |
| Historical document summarization use_case.history.historical_doc_summarization | 2.1% |