Model Profile
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Use this page to decide where this model is a strong fit. Rankings below are benchmark-backed by use case, with explicit confidence and contributor metrics.
Identity
ID: meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Author: meta-llama
Origin: huggingface_catalog
Arch: unknown
Benchmark Coverage
Scored use cases: 12
Avg confidence: 18.0%
Evidence points: 63
Raw rows: 40
Weighted rows: 10
Catalog Metadata
Parameters: unknown
Context window: 4096
Downloads: 717,694
Intelligence Profile
Dimension Breakdown
No eq benchmarks found
No creativity benchmarks found
* Low confidence — limited benchmark evidence for this dimension
3/5 dimensions scored · Last updated Apr 2, 2026
Benchmark Signals
Click through to the benchmark source behind this model profile.
DuckDB NSQL Leaderboard
all_execution_accuracy
Normalized value 84.6% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Metric definition workshop
duckdb_nsql_leaderboard.all_execution_accuracy · Apr 1, 2026
LanguageBench Translation Official (Split)
translation_to:bleu
Normalized value 55.2% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Archaic and historical translation
languagebench_translation_official.translation_to_bleu · Apr 1, 2026
LanguageBench
overall:mean
Normalized value 75.2% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Archaic and historical translation
languagebench.overall_mean · Apr 1, 2026
LanguageBench Grammar/Clarity Official (Split)
grammar_clarity_score_pct
Normalized value 83.3% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Translation and localization
languagebench_grammar_clarity_official.grammar_clarity_score_pct · Apr 1, 2026
LanguageBench Translation Official (Split)
translation_to:chrf
Normalized value 69.8% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Legal translation
languagebench_translation_official.translation_to_chrf · Apr 1, 2026
LanguageBench
translation_to:bleu
Normalized value 55.2% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Archaic and historical translation
languagebench.translation_to_bleu · Apr 1, 2026
Some fit rows have limited benchmark evidence.
11 of 12 scored use cases have low confidence or thin contributor coverage.
Coverage Diagnostics
actively scoredUse-Case Scores
23
Total Measurements
40
Weighted Measurements
10
Weighted Sources
5
Raw Source Coverage
Weighted Source Coverage
Best Use Cases for This Model
| Use Case | Score |
|---|---|
| Archaic and historical translation use_case.history.archaic_translation | 18.3% |
| Historical document summarization use_case.history.historical_doc_summarization | 14.3% |
| Metric definition workshop use_case.data.metric_definition_workshop | 13.6% |
| Legal translation use_case.legal.legal_translation | 13.2% |
| Grammar and writing coach use_case.lang.grammar_coach | 11.6% |
| Brand voice localization use_case.mkt.brand_voice_localization | 11.4% |
| Data quality assistant use_case.data.data_quality_assistant | 11.4% |
| SQL debugging use_case.data.sql_debugging | 11.2% |
| Language conversation partner use_case.lang.conversation_partner | 10.6% |
| Executive brief from metrics use_case.data.exec_brief_from_metrics | 10.3% |
| Translation and localization use_case.business.translation_localization | 10.1% |
| Insight mining from text corpora use_case.data.insight_mining | 10.0% |