Model Profile
gpt-oss-120b
Use this page to decide where this model is a strong fit. Rankings below are benchmark-backed by use case, with explicit confidence and contributor metrics.
Identity
ID: openai/gpt-oss-120b
Author: openai
Origin: huggingface_catalog
Arch: unknown
Benchmark Coverage
Scored use cases: 4
Avg confidence: 10.6%
Evidence points: 24
Raw rows: 25
Weighted rows: 8
Catalog Metadata
Parameters: unknown
Context window: 4096
Downloads: 3,477,982
Intelligence Profile
Dimension Breakdown
No eq benchmarks found
No accuracy benchmarks found
No creativity benchmarks found
No based benchmarks found
* Low confidence — limited benchmark evidence for this dimension
1/5 dimensions scored · Last updated Apr 21, 2026
Benchmark Signals
Click through to the benchmark source behind this model profile.
LEXam Leaderboard
average_score_pct
Normalized value 63.6% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Contract Drafting & Redlining
lexam_leaderboard.average_score_pct · Mar 31, 2026
LEXam Leaderboard
open_question_judge_score_pct
Normalized value 66.6% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Contract redline summary
lexam_leaderboard.open_question_judge_score_pct · Mar 31, 2026
SciArena Leaderboard
rating_elo
Normalized value 62.6% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Contract redline summary
sciarena_leaderboard.rating_elo · Apr 1, 2026
LEXam Leaderboard
mcq_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 62.0% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Contract redline summary
lexam_leaderboard.mcq_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Aider Polyglot Leaderboard
percent_correct_pct
Normalized value 44.4% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Contract redline summary
aider_polyglot.percent_correct_pct · Apr 1, 2026
BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard
average_performance_pct
Normalized value 68.6% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Contract redline summary
bridge_medical_leaderboard.average_performance_pct · Apr 1, 2026
Some fit rows have limited benchmark evidence.
4 of 4 scored use cases have low confidence or thin contributor coverage.
Coverage Diagnostics
actively scoredUse-Case Scores
4
Total Measurements
25
Weighted Measurements
8
Weighted Sources
4
Raw Source Coverage
Weighted Source Coverage
Best Use Cases for This Model
| Use Case | Score |
|---|---|
| Contract Drafting & Redlining use_case.legal.contract_drafting | 7.2% |
| Contract redline summary use_case.legal.contract_redline_summary | 6.7% |
| Contract term extraction use_case.legal.contract_term_extraction | 6.5% |
| Clause playbook check use_case.legal.playbook_clause_check | 6.5% |