Model Profile
mistralai/mistral-large-2512
Use this page to decide where this model is a strong fit. Rankings below are benchmark-backed by use case, with explicit confidence and contributor metrics.
Identity
ID: external/mistralai/mistral-large-2512
Author: mistralai
Origin: external_benchmark_shadow
Arch: unknown
Benchmark Coverage
Scored use cases: 12
Avg confidence: 31.2%
Evidence points: 232
Raw rows: 480
Weighted rows: 29
Catalog Metadata
Parameters: unknown
Context window: 4096
Downloads: 0
Intelligence Profile
Dimension Breakdown
No eq benchmarks found
No accuracy benchmarks found
No creativity benchmarks found
No based benchmarks found
1/5 dimensions scored · Last updated Apr 21, 2026
Benchmark Signals
Click through to the benchmark source behind this model profile.
Vals Legal Bench
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 82.6% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Contract Drafting & Redlining
vals_legal_bench.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vals CorpFin v2
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 79.1% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Thesis red teaming
vals_corp_fin_v2.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vals Case Law v2
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 53.7% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Contract Drafting & Redlining
vals_case_law_v2.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vals Tax Eval v2
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 88.5% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Accounts payable invoice extraction (text)
vals_tax_eval_v2.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vals CorpFin v2
shared_max_context_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 70.7% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Thesis red teaming
vals_corp_fin_v2.shared_max_context_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vectara HHEM Leaderboard
overall_answer_rate_pct
Normalized value 96.8% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Literature synthesis with citations
vectara_hhem_leaderboard.overall_answer_rate_pct · Apr 1, 2026
Some fit rows have limited benchmark evidence.
2 of 12 scored use cases have low confidence or thin contributor coverage.
Coverage Diagnostics
actively scoredUse-Case Scores
117
Total Measurements
480
Weighted Measurements
29
Weighted Sources
12
Raw Source Coverage
Weighted Source Coverage
Best Use Cases for This Model
| Use Case | Score |
|---|---|
| Thesis red teaming use_case.fin.thesis_red_team | 21.2% |
| Earnings call synthesis use_case.fin.earnings_call_synthesis | 19.1% |
| Transaction anomaly narrative use_case.fin.transaction_anomaly_narrative | 18.8% |
| Accounts payable invoice extraction (text) use_case.fin.ap_invoice_extraction | 18.4% |
| KYC profile synthesis use_case.fin.kyc_profile_synthesis | 18.0% |
| AML alert triage use_case.fin.aml_alert_triage | 18.0% |
| Filings summarization (10-K/10-Q) use_case.fin.filings_summarization | 16.7% |
| Contract Drafting & Redlining use_case.legal.contract_drafting | 16.0% |
| Contract Q&A (RAG grounded) use_case.legal.contract_qna | 14.7% |
| Regulatory summary use_case.legal.regulatory_summary | 14.4% |
| Literature synthesis with citations use_case.bio.literature_synthesis | 14.2% |
| Cross-paper contradiction analysis use_case.bio.paper_contradictions | 14.2% |