Model Profile
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
Use this page to decide where this model is a strong fit. Rankings below are benchmark-backed by use case, with explicit confidence and contributor metrics.
Identity
ID: external/google/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview
Author: google
Origin: external_benchmark_shadow
Arch: unknown
Benchmark Coverage
Scored use cases: 12
Avg confidence: 42.0%
Evidence points: 278
Raw rows: 402
Weighted rows: 35
Catalog Metadata
Parameters: unknown
Context window: 4096
Downloads: 0
Price / 1M tokens: $0.56 (blended 3:1)
Intelligence Profile
Dimension Breakdown
No eq benchmarks found
No accuracy benchmarks found
No creativity benchmarks found
No based benchmarks found
1/5 dimensions scored · Last updated Apr 21, 2026
Benchmark Signals
Click through to the benchmark source behind this model profile.
FACTS Benchmark Suite
facts_grounding_score_pct
Normalized value 79.4% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Knowledge base Q&A (fast, no citations)
facts_benchmark_suite.facts_grounding_score_pct · Apr 1, 2026
Vals Finance Agent
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 72.7% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Thesis red teaming
vals_finance_agent.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vectara HHEM Leaderboard
overall_hallucination_error_pct
Normalized value 70.5% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Knowledge base Q&A (fast, no citations)
vectara_hhem_leaderboard.overall_hallucination_error_pct · Apr 1, 2026
Vals CorpFin v2
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 74.2% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Thesis red teaming
vals_corp_fin_v2.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vals Tax Eval v2
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 84.9% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Accounts payable invoice extraction (text)
vals_tax_eval_v2.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
FACTS Benchmark Suite
average_score_pct
Normalized value 68.0% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Knowledge base Q&A (fast, no citations)
facts_benchmark_suite.average_score_pct · Apr 1, 2026
Coverage Diagnostics
actively scoredUse-Case Scores
143
Total Measurements
402
Weighted Measurements
35
Weighted Sources
16
Raw Source Coverage
Weighted Source Coverage
Best Use Cases for This Model
| Use Case | Score |
|---|---|
| Thesis red teaming use_case.fin.thesis_red_team | 36.0% |
| Earnings call synthesis use_case.fin.earnings_call_synthesis | 32.5% |
| Transaction anomaly narrative use_case.fin.transaction_anomaly_narrative | 31.9% |
| KYC profile synthesis use_case.fin.kyc_profile_synthesis | 30.6% |
| AML alert triage use_case.fin.aml_alert_triage | 30.6% |
| Accounts payable invoice extraction (text) use_case.fin.ap_invoice_extraction | 29.1% |
| Filings summarization (10-K/10-Q) use_case.fin.filings_summarization | 28.4% |
| Literature synthesis with citations use_case.bio.literature_synthesis | 26.7% |
| Cross-paper contradiction analysis use_case.bio.paper_contradictions | 26.7% |
| Knowledge base Q&A (fast, no citations) use_case.business.kb_qna_fast | 26.4% |
| Component selection assistant use_case.eng.component_selection | 24.5% |
| Runbook step assistant use_case.sre.runbook_steps | 23.9% |