Model Profile
anthropic/claude-opus-4-5-20251101-thinking
Use this page to decide where this model is a strong fit. Rankings below are benchmark-backed by use case, with explicit confidence and contributor metrics.
Identity
ID: external/anthropic/claude-opus-4-5-20251101-thinking
Author: anthropic
Origin: external_benchmark_shadow
Arch: unknown
Benchmark Coverage
Scored use cases: 12
Avg confidence: 26.7%
Evidence points: 212
Raw rows: 471
Weighted rows: 20
Catalog Metadata
Parameters: unknown
Context window: 4096
Downloads: 0
Intelligence Profile
Dimension Breakdown
No eq benchmarks found
No accuracy benchmarks found
No creativity benchmarks found
No based benchmarks found
1/5 dimensions scored · Last updated Apr 21, 2026
Benchmark Signals
Click through to the benchmark source behind this model profile.
Vals Finance Agent
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 92.8% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Thesis red teaming
vals_finance_agent.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vals CorpFin v2
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 90.8% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Thesis red teaming
vals_corp_fin_v2.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vals SWE-bench
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 94.7% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Simulation setup assistant
vals_swebench.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vals Tax Eval v2
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 93.6% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Accounts payable invoice extraction (text)
vals_tax_eval_v2.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vals LiveCodeBench
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 93.4% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Simulation setup assistant
vals_lcb.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Vals GPQA
overall_accuracy_pct
Normalized value 85.1% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Cross-paper contradiction analysis
vals_gpqa.overall_accuracy_pct · Mar 31, 2026
Some fit rows have limited benchmark evidence.
5 of 12 scored use cases have low confidence or thin contributor coverage.
Coverage Diagnostics
actively scoredUse-Case Scores
120
Total Measurements
471
Weighted Measurements
20
Weighted Sources
14
Raw Source Coverage
Weighted Source Coverage
Best Use Cases for This Model
| Use Case | Score |
|---|---|
| Thesis red teaming use_case.fin.thesis_red_team | 29.0% |
| Accounts payable invoice extraction (text) use_case.fin.ap_invoice_extraction | 27.8% |
| Earnings call synthesis use_case.fin.earnings_call_synthesis | 26.2% |
| Transaction anomaly narrative use_case.fin.transaction_anomaly_narrative | 25.7% |
| AML alert triage use_case.fin.aml_alert_triage | 24.7% |
| KYC profile synthesis use_case.fin.kyc_profile_synthesis | 24.7% |
| Filings summarization (10-K/10-Q) use_case.fin.filings_summarization | 22.9% |
| Quant research code generation use_case.fin.alpha_research_codegen | 20.3% |
| Simulation setup assistant use_case.eng.simulation_setup_assistant | 20.2% |
| Component selection assistant use_case.eng.component_selection | 18.9% |
| Cross-paper contradiction analysis use_case.bio.paper_contradictions | 17.2% |
| Literature synthesis with citations use_case.bio.literature_synthesis | 17.2% |