Model Profile
Qwen3-32B
Use this page to decide where this model is a strong fit. Rankings below are benchmark-backed by use case, with explicit confidence and contributor metrics.
Identity
ID: Qwen/Qwen3-32B
Author: Qwen
Origin: huggingface_catalog
Arch: unknown
Benchmark Coverage
Scored use cases: 12
Avg confidence: 14.0%
Evidence points: 59
Raw rows: 55
Weighted rows: 22
Catalog Metadata
Parameters: unknown
Context window: 4096
Downloads: 1,886,648
Intelligence Profile
Dimension Breakdown
No iq benchmarks found
No accuracy benchmarks found
No creativity benchmarks found
No based benchmarks found
* Low confidence — limited benchmark evidence for this dimension
1/5 dimensions scored · Last updated Apr 21, 2026
Benchmark Signals
Click through to the benchmark source behind this model profile.
DuckDB NSQL Leaderboard
all_execution_accuracy
Normalized value 65.4% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Metric definition workshop
duckdb_nsql_leaderboard.all_execution_accuracy · Apr 1, 2026
EQ-Bench Leaderboard
eq_bench_score
Normalized value 82.8% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Social post generation
eq_bench.eq_bench_score · Apr 1, 2026
Vectara HHEM Leaderboard
overall_hallucination_error_pct
Normalized value 81.1% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Cross-paper contradiction analysis
vectara_hhem_leaderboard.overall_hallucination_error_pct · Apr 1, 2026
Vectara HHEM Leaderboard
science_hallucination_error_pct
Normalized value 89.9% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Cross-paper contradiction analysis
vectara_hhem_leaderboard.science_hallucination_error_pct · Apr 1, 2026
Vectara HHEM Leaderboard
overall_answer_rate_pct
Normalized value 99.7% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Cross-paper contradiction analysis
vectara_hhem_leaderboard.overall_answer_rate_pct · Apr 1, 2026
DuckDB NSQL Leaderboard
hard_execution_accuracy
Normalized value 25.0% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in SQL debugging
duckdb_nsql_leaderboard.hard_execution_accuracy · Apr 1, 2026
Some fit rows have limited benchmark evidence.
12 of 12 scored use cases have low confidence or thin contributor coverage.
Coverage Diagnostics
actively scoredUse-Case Scores
18
Total Measurements
55
Weighted Measurements
22
Weighted Sources
6
Raw Source Coverage
Weighted Source Coverage
Best Use Cases for This Model
| Use Case | Score |
|---|---|
| Metric definition workshop use_case.data.metric_definition_workshop | 11.5% |
| Text-to-SQL analyst assistant use_case.data.text_to_sql | 10.7% |
| Data quality assistant use_case.data.data_quality_assistant | 9.9% |
| SQL debugging use_case.data.sql_debugging | 9.6% |
| Executive brief from metrics use_case.data.exec_brief_from_metrics | 9.0% |
| Product positioning and messaging use_case.mkt.product_positioning | 8.6% |
| Campaign brief use_case.mkt.campaign_brief | 8.6% |
| Social post generation use_case.mkt.social_post_generation | 8.6% |
| Insight mining from text corpora use_case.data.insight_mining | 8.6% |
| Dashboard narratives use_case.data.dashboard_narratives | 8.6% |
| Cross-paper contradiction analysis use_case.bio.paper_contradictions | 8.3% |
| Literature synthesis with citations use_case.bio.literature_synthesis | 8.3% |